Long-Term Treatment and Effect of Discontinuation of Calcifediol in Postmenopausal Women with Vitamin D Deficiency: A Randomized Trial.

Vitamin D plays a major role in bone health and probably also in multiple extraskeletal acute and chronic diseases. Although supplementation with calcifediol, a vitamin D metabolite, has demonstrated efficacy and safety in short-term clinical trials, its effects after long-term monthly administration have been studied less extensively. This report describes the results of a 1-year, phase III-IV, double-blind, randomized, controlled, parallel, multicenter superiority clinical trial to assess the efficacy and safety of monthly calcifediol 0.266 mg versus cholecalciferol 25,000 IU (0.625 mg) in postmenopausal women with vitamin D deficiency (25(OH)D < 20 ng/mL). A total of 303 women were randomized and 298 evaluated. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to calcifediol 0.266 mg/month for 12 months (Group A1), calcifediol 0.266 mg/month for 4 months followed by placebo for 8 months (Group A2), and cholecalciferol 25,000 IU/month (0.625 mg/month) for 12 months (Group B). By month 4, stable 25(OH)D levels were documented with both calcifediol and cholecalciferol (intention-to-treat population): 26.8 ± 8.5 ng/mL (Group A1) and 23.1 ± 5.4 ng/mL (Group B). By month 12, 25(OH)D levels were 23.9 ± 8.0 ng/mL (Group A1) and 22.4 ± 5.5 ng/mL (Group B). When calcifediol treatment was withdrawn in Group A2, 25(OH)D levels decreased to baseline levels (28.5 ± 8.7 ng/mL at month 4 versus 14.4 ± 6.0 ng/mL at month 12). No relevant treatment-related safety issues were reported in any of the groups. The results confirm that long-term treatment with monthly calcifediol in vitamin D-deficient patients is effective and safe. The withdrawal of treatment leads to a pronounced decrease of 25(OH)D levels. Calcifediol presented a faster onset of action compared to monthly cholecalciferol. Long-term treatment produces stable and sustained 25(OH)D concentrations with no associated safety concerns. © 2023 Faes Farma SA. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Calcifediol is superior to cholecalciferol in improving vitamin D status in postmenopausal women: a randomized trial.

Vitamin D has shown to play a role in multiple diseases due to its skeletal and extraskeletal actions. Furthermore, vitamin D deficiency has become a worldwide health issue. Few supplementation guidelines mention calcifediol treatment, despite being the direct precursor of calcitriol and the biomarker of vitamin D status. This 1-year, phase III-IV, double-blind, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial assessed the efficacy and safety of calcifediol 0.266 mg soft capsules in vitamin D-deficient postmenopausal women, compared to cholecalciferol. Results reported here are from a prespecified interim analysis, for the evaluation of the study's primary endpoint: the percentage of patients with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels above 30 ng/ml after 4 months. A total of 303 patients were enrolled, of whom 298 were included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Patients with baseline levels of serum 25(OH)D <20 ng/ml were randomized 1:1:1 to calcifediol 0.266 mg/month for 12 months, calcifediol 0.266 mg/month for 4 months followed by placebo for 8 months, and cholecalciferol 25,000 IU/month for 12 months. At month 4, 35.0% of postmenopausal women treated with calcifediol and 8.2% of those treated with cholecalciferol reached serum 25(OH)D levels above 30 ng/ml (p < 0.0001). The most remarkable difference between both drugs in terms of mean change in serum 25(OH)D levels was observed after the first month of treatment (mean ± standard deviation change = 9.7 ± 6.7 and 5.1 ± 3.5 ng/ml in patients treated with calcifediol and cholecalciferol, respectively). No relevant treatment-related safety issues were reported in any of the groups studied. These results thus confirm that calcifediol is effective, faster, and more potent than cholecalciferol in raising serum 25(OH)D levels and is a valuable option for the treatment of vitamin D deficiency. © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Gout Activity Score has predictive validity and is sensitive to change: results from the Nottingham Gout Treatment Trial (Phase II).

OBJECTIVES: To examine the predictive validity of the Gout Activity Score (GAS), its correlation with the Gout Impact Scale (GIS) and their sensitivity to change. METHODS: Data from a clinical trial in which participants with one or more gout flares in the previous year were recruited from primary care and randomized to nurse-led or continuing usual care were used in this study. GAS and GIS were calculated as described, with higher scores indicating worse disease activity and quality of life, respectively. The correlation between GAS and GIS was examined using Spearman's correlation. Standardized response means (SRMs) were calculated to assess sensitivity to change. The association between GAS at baseline and the number of flares in the next 12 months was evaluated using Poisson regression. Data analyses were performed using STATA version 14, with P-values <0.05 being statistically significant. RESULTS: There was low positive correlation between GAS and gout concern overall and unmet treatment need subscales of GIS (r = 0.34-0.45). Female sex associated independently with fewer gout flares, while increasing GAS, BMI and age associated independently with frequent flares. Of all the outcome measures examined, GAS was the most responsive to change (SRM 0.89 to -0.53). Of the GIS domains, the gout concern overall domain had the best sensitivity to change (SRM 1.06-0.01). CONCLUSION: GAS is sensitive to change, has predictive validity and correlates with relevant domains of GIS such as gout concern overall. Additional independent validation of GAS is required before it can be adopted in clinical practice.

Hyperuricaemia with deposition: latest evidence and therapeutic approach.

This article reviews recent evidence on urate deposition and the opportunity for a therapeutic approach. We reviewed Pubmed 2013-2015 literature using the search terms 'deposition' with 'hyperuricaemia', 'gout', 'ultrasonography', 'DECT' (dual-energy computed tomography), 'radiography', 'CT'(computed tomography), 'MRI' (magnetic resonance imaging), or 'cardiovascular', in addition to a digital bibliographic library compiled by the authors with 2072 papers on hyperuricaemia and gout. Relevant papers on the topic were selected. Recent evidence, mostly based on imaging studies, showed a continuum from hyperuricaemia to deposition and clinical manifestations. Chronic inflammation and structural damage may be present even in asymptomatic patients with crystal-proved deposition. The impact of early intervention in patients with asymptomatic deposition either on vascular outcomes or further structural joint damage has not been demonstrated yet. In conclusion, a worldwide definition of gout is still lacking, stages from hyperuricaemia to clinical gout not being definitively defined. Although there is increasing interest on the impact of early deposits on joint damage and cardiovascular outcomes, robust evidence is still lacking to fully support interventions.

Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of gout.

Gout has been academically considered to be a step-up disease consisting of different stages: acute gout, intercritical gout, and chronic gout. This simple approach may lead to misinterpretation and misdiagnosis. In clinical practice, we should consider gout as a single disease with either or both acute (most commonly, episodes of acute inflammation) and persistent clinical manifestations, but not restricted to chronic synovitis. In this article, an innovative, practical, and rational approach to the clinical manifestations and diagnosis of gout is presented, which may be supportive for clinicians involved in everyday care and management of patients with gout.

Canakinumab for gout: a specific, patient-profiled indication.

The role of interleukin-1 (IL-1) in inflammation induced by crystals, and especially by monosodium urate crystals (MSUCs), has raised much interest in both basic and clinical investigation. Several drugs have been developed, and more are still in development, to block IL-1 driven inflammation, though to date only canakinumab (blocking IL-1ß) has been labelled, yet limited to the European Union, with a restricted indication to treat episodes of acute inflammation (EAIs) in patients with gout in whom other therapeutic choices are unacceptable. Other medications developed for IL-1 blocking, such as anakinra and rilonacept, have been tested in gout patients in clinical trials, but lack label approval and may be further restricted to orphan indication in gout. Notwithstanding, the use of IL-1 blockade to prevent EAIs in gout looks promising, but no drug has yet obtained approval for such an indication.